tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-65023942169188448902023-11-16T05:38:00.247-05:00Living as a Prochoice ChristianChristian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.comBlogger86125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-80196739465215226372013-02-21T12:51:00.001-05:002013-02-21T12:51:07.264-05:00Catholic Hospital Argues Fetuses are Not Persons<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2013/02/catholic-hospital-argues-fetuses-are-not-persons/" target="_blank">AbortionGang.</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
On January 25, 2013, anti-choicers from across the country gathered to march on Washington DC, in a show of their support for fetal life. This year, I’d almost forgotten about the March for Life- mostly because the event is a ton of high schoolers who are bused in to increase numbers. It’s a way for teenagers to travel, have time off from school, and hang with their friends- and sometimes they even get a little extra credit for going. So I’m not really worried about hundreds of kids taking a vacation (although you should listen to <a href="https://twitter.com/clinicescort" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">@ClinicEscort</a>talk to a train full of them about her abortion experience <a href="http://feministing.com/2013/01/29/pro-choice-on-amtrak-i-told-a-group-of-anti-choice-teenagers-about-my-abortion" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">here</a>).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
What reminded me that the March of Life was happening soon, was an article posted on January 23 on a Colorado news website titled “<a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/126808/in-malpractice-case-catholic-hospital-argues-fetuses-arent-people" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">In malpractice case, Catholic hospital argues fetuses aren’t people.</a>”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
What?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Here’s a summary of what happened: in 2006, a woman who was 7 months pregnant with twins arrived at the hospital short of breath and vomiting. She passed out, and had a massive heart attack because of a clog in her artery. The doctor on call never showed up that night, the woman died less than an hour after entering the hospital, and the twins died in the womb. A terribly heartbreaking situation. The husband is filing a wrongful-death lawsuit for the twins–he realized that his wife was beyond saving, but argues that the doctor should have arrived to perform a cesarean and saved the twins.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The Catholic hospital’s lawyers countered that fetuses aren’t people, and therefore the husband cannot file a wrongful-death suit for them.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
What?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
If you ever want to know if someone REALLY believes what they are saying, pin it against money, apparently. The hospital has twice–before a court, and an appeals court–argued that <b style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">persons are born</b>, and therefore the viable, 7 month gestation fetuses are not persons. Once again: the lawyers for a Catholic hospital which has a mission stating, “Catholic health care ministry witnesses to the sanctity of life ‘from the moment of conception until death,’” have said,</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #666666; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 10px 30px; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
…the court “should not overturn the long-standing rule in Colorado that the term ‘person,’ as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive. Colorado state courts define ‘person’ under the Act to include only those born alive. Therefore Plaintiffs cannot maintain wrongful death claims based on two unborn fetuses.”</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Now, there is a very important point here I’d like to make- if the Catholic lawyers had argued the other way, things could have been very different. If they had agreed that the twin fetuses could have a wrongful-death lawsuit filed for them, and that the Catholic hospitals recognized their personhood, they could have had the beginnings of legal precedent for recognizing fetuses as persons. Of course, many hospitals and laws already recognize the value of a viable fetus to a family, and this case couldn’t have banned abortion overnight. But they didn’t choose to do that- for this Catholic hospital, it seems that <strong style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">money is more important than fetal life</strong>.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I probably sound like I’m repeating myself a lot, but this is a big deal. If a Catholic hospital will argue in a court of law that fetuses aren’t persons, then perhaps we shouldn’t respect their argument when it’s based upon the concept that fetuses are persons (which is quite often). If they really, truly believed and supported their position, they wouldn’t argue against it. If even Catholic hospitals following the rules of the US Catholic Bishops (some of the biggest fighters against abortion) don’t believe their ideas, why should we consider laws they try to pass? Or let them have ways to opt out of the birth control mandate?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I don’t think we should. Of course, these types of things aren’t decisions I get to make personally. But I can remember these facts about antichoicers while I am having discussions with them: that anti-choice people get abortions too; that more people are calling themselves pro-life, but support for legal abortion has not decreased; that Catholic hospitals don’t always follow the idea that life begins at conception. Some people are incredibly sure of themselves, until they face a trial of their beliefs. My goal is not to change minds overnight, or push people further into their beliefs, but to open their mind to the vast possibilities around them. Sharing this story about a Catholic hospital denying the personhood of fetuses is one way to show the world is not completely black and white for anyone, but a huge ball of gray.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-80746974982753112172013-02-21T12:49:00.003-05:002013-02-21T12:49:37.260-05:00Do not let anti-choice youth conference fool you. Young people are Prochoice.<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/11/do-not-let-an-anti-choice-youth-conference-fool-you-young-people-are-pro-choice/" target="_blank">AbortionGang.</a> Dates mentioned in this article will be incorrect.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This weekend, the International Prolife Youth Conference will be happening in California. Their theme is “Abolitionist Rising,” an attempt to compare the abhorrent practice of slavery to legal abortion. Hosted by Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust & Priests for Life, the conference’s goal is to equip youth to fight against abortion and change their perspective of the anti-choice movement.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
While many anti-choice supporters, websites and blogs are mourning the election results, the IPYC facebook (which we will not link to) has stayed upbeat. I wondered if perhaps they thought they found the cure to the dying GOP platform: getting youth involved. While it sounds like a good idea, the anti-choice movement gravely misunderstands today’s youth.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The Presidential election just a few days ago tells us a lot about millennials. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/main" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Sixty percent</a> of those 18-29 years old voted for President Obama, compared to 44% of those 65 and older. There is a clear trend towards younger people being more progressive. The Center for American Progress found that of 21 core values and beliefs held by America’s youth, only four of them could be deemed conservative. They also found that 84% of today’s youth <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/progressive-movement/news/2012/11/05/43972/millennial-voters-refuse-to-be-left-out-of-this-election/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">believe</a> that “we should do everything we can to make sure that people who want to use prescription birth control have affordable access to it and that cost is not an obstacle.” Remember that anti-choicers are strongly against birth control, including financial coverage of it and the use of it by women of all ages.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Advocates for Youth researched what today’s young people think about abortion. 68% of Millennials <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/11/07/power-youth-vote" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">believe</a> abortion should be available in their community, compared to 60% of the Boomer generation (interesting to note the high majority of both; this is one explanation for why the majority of anti-choice leaders are older people). Today’s youth are more multicultural; there are more people of color among today’s youth than among previous generations. This diversity is another point against conservative, anti-choice groups who have a difficult time reaching out to people of color (their “black genocide” movement seems to incite more anger than anything).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Perhaps the IPYC leaders are excited because they believe they can mold young people’s minds into becoming anti-choice? Their facebook description states the conference will “change your perspective of the pro-life movement across the nation.” They might have a point there–until these young people decide to educate themselves on the issues instead of just listening to speakers. Take the example of <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/10/30/how-i-lost-faith-in-%E2%80%9Cpro-life%E2%80%9D-movement-1" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Libby Anne</a>. Upon doing her own research, Libby Anne realized that the anti-choice movement actually does more to cause abortions than stop them. She realized that the policies of the pro-choice movement reduces unplanned pregnancies and helps women around the world. Youth attending the IPYC will likely listen to speakers this weekend claim they want to “help women,” but many will soon see that the anti-choice movement is causing a lot more harm than good.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So this weekend, when you see anti-choice activists tweeting about the IPYC, remember that just because the election is over, it doesn’t mean the anti-choice movement is going to give up or go home. They didn’t four years ago, and they definitely won’t now. We can’t stop caring either! <a href="http://www.drawtheline.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Sign</a> the Bill of Reproductive Rights, <a href="http://blog-aauw.org/2012/11/07/what-do-you-want-to-see-on-dayone/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">tell</a> the American Association of University Women what you think Obama and Congress should do on Day One, <a href="http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/6713/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=12090" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">join</a> the fight to repeal the Hyde Amendment–let’s set our own priorities!</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-81345120755645400232012-10-20T11:01:00.006-04:002012-10-20T11:01:58.541-04:00Abortion, Religion, & the VP DebateOriginally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/10/abortion-religion-and-the-vp-debate/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Last night, women across the country sat and watched the Vice Presidential Debates, and waited for the two men on stage to mention their existence. Seventy-three minutes into the 90 minute debate, we finally <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/10/11/162754053/transcript-biden-ryan-vice-presidential-debate" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">got to hear</a> the candidates talk about abortion.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
As a pro-choice Christian, I was both very excited and very disappointed in the question asked of the candidates. I was very excited because a question about faith and reproductive rights gave Biden a chance to show that no, not every religious person lets their personal beliefs dictate policy. Biden said,</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #666666; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 10px 30px; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“But I refuse to impose it on equally devout Christians and Muslims and Jews and — I just refuse to impose that on others, unlike my friend here, the congressman.</div>
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I — I do not believe that — that we have a right to tell other people that women, they — they can’t control their body. It’s a decision between them and their doctor, in my view.”</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This is really powerful. Biden is acknowledging what our Constitution tells us: we cannot let our religious beliefs be the basis for law. There are thousands of religious Americans who have personal beliefs about abortion that do NOT cause them to want to restrict reproductive rights. Even more religious people have beliefs that are actually in favor of reproductive rights. To take one person’s religious beliefs as law would be immoral and wrong.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I was also disappointed in the question. A specific question about abortion and Catholicism limited the discussion greatly. Congressman Ryan has come out against funding for birth control under Obamacare, and <a href="http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/assets/download-files/rep-paul-ryan-r-wi-profile.pdf" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">wants to defund Planned Parenthood</a>, which provides contraceptives, STI screenings, and cancer screenings in addition to abortion care. By talking only about abortion in relation to religious beliefs, the public didn’t get to hear all of Ryan’s extreme anti-woman views. Limiting the conversation to religion and abortion also made it impossible to bring up the issues faced by women of color, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/26/born-in-chains-american-way-birth-prison" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">inmates facing pregnancy</a>, or poor people who need to use <a href="http://www.fundabortionnow.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">abortion funds</a> to pay for a legal medical procedure.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The conversation was restricted to such a small part of reproductive justice, but Congressman Ryan’s stance was still terrifying. We all know that Romney doesn’t really have a position on abortion; he flip flops whichever way will get him more votes. But Ryan is very clear that he has a strong stance, which is guided by his personal beliefs. He said,</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #666666; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 10px 30px; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“I don’t see how a person can separate their public life from their private life or from their faith. Our faith informs us in everything we do.”</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Ryan’s private faith tells him that abortion should be illegal in every situations. So when he goes on to say that, “the policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother,” I don’t believe him for one second. Ryan’s personal beliefs guide him in how he handles public, government policy. With Romney’s lack of a strong stance on abortion, Ryan would clearly lead a Romney/Ryan administration on pushing for a complete ban on abortion. Ryan said this in no uncertain terms: “All I’m saying is if you believe that life begins at conception, that therefore doesn’t change the definition of life. That’s a principle.” He doesn’t believe in exceptions to abortion bans, and was barely able to fall in line with Romney’s campaign.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It would be extremely dangerous for all of us to have Paul Ryan as the Vice President of the United States. Those who support reproductive rights must step up to the plate. Talk to your neighbors and friends; donate to a campaign; sign the <a href="http://www.drawtheline.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Bill of Reproductive Rights</a>; ensure you are <a href="http://registertovote.org/index.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">registered to vote</a>. We need everyone to stand up.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-87264671025209634422012-10-20T11:01:00.003-04:002012-10-20T11:01:18.845-04:00Draw the LineOriginally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/10/draw-the-line/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The Center for Reproductive Rights this week announced a new campaign they are running called <a href="http://www.drawtheline.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Draw the Line</a>. The campaign shows us a number of headlines (including “Woman Arrested for Using Birth Control,” “The Last Abortion Clinic,” and “Roe v Wade Overturned”) that could soon become reality if the current trend in anti-choice legislation continues. In the end, it asks readers to sign the Bill of Reproductive Rights, which has three main components:</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
1) The right to make our own decisions about our reproductive health and future, free from intrusion or coercion by any government, group or individual.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
2) The right to a full range of safe, affordable, and readily accessible reproductive healthcare, including pregnancy care, preventive services, contraception, abortion, and fertility treatment, and accurate information about all of the above.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
3) The right to be free from discrimination in access to reproductive healthcare or on the basis of our reproductive decisions.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
These are extremely fundamental and important rights. In deciding to create this campaign, Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights,<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/abortion-rights-group-launches-reproductive-bill-rights" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> told Mother Jones</a>, ”We knew it was time to not only continue defending in the courts, but to begin a very aggressive campaign with a clear articulation of what it is that we are seeking to establish.” In other words, this is not to replace the hard work being done across the states to stop current anti-choice legislation, but it is a way for people across the movement to come together and take a stand for the future.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
After signing the Bill of Reproductive Rights, I decided to take a stand of my own, and draw a line in my conversations on Twitter. In the past, I’ve tried to inform antichoicers why abortion would still be legal even if a fetus was considered a person. Our rights do not allow us to use the body of another human being without their consent–if a woman didn’t want to be pregnant, she could still end the pregnancy. However, I’ve found that the most common response I get is for the anti-choicer to start questioning <em style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">my</em> humanity, by calling me cruel and claiming I have no heart. Since this tactic is obviously getting me nowhere, I’ve decided to draw a line and stop letting anti-choicers control the conversation. I will no longer let their assumption about fetal personhood into the conversation. This is one way I can work towards a world where language is led by reproductive justice advocates.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So how will you take a stand? Will you sign the<a href="http://www.drawtheline.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> Bill of Reproductive Rights</a>? Will you <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">call your local legislator</a> and tell them to support abortion rights? Will you<a href="http://www.fundabortionnow.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> make a donation</a> to a local Abortion Fund? Will you do all these things and more? Let us know in the comments if you’ve learned of other ways we can Draw the Line and take a stand against anti-choice attacks!</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-14197292095482114602012-10-20T11:00:00.004-04:002012-10-20T11:00:49.092-04:00Teens are Having Sex. Get Over It!Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/09/teens-are-having-sex-get-over-it/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
A new <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/09/17/857581/2-of-5-women-contraception/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">study</a> came out this week saying that 2 in 5 women don’t use birth control. The two most common reasons listed for not using birth control were not being sexual active, and believing they were unable to become pregnant. The study also mentioned that many women underestimate their ability to become pregnant. I believe our current lack of <a href="http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications450" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">comprehensive sexual education</a> is partially responsible for this situation. I also believe that sex education is not the only change needed. We need to stop being afraid of young adults having sex, and we need to stop thinking of it as a horrible tragedy when young adults have sex. We need to stop believing that it’s wrong to talk about sex with anyone, at any age. We need to start seeing our body’s sexual organs, cycles and activities as part of us.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Young adults, yes, teenagers, are having sex. Our culture’s refusal to acknowledge that has led to the situation we’re in now. Any sort of talk about teenage sex is deemed as “encouraging” or “promoting” teenage sex, and thus seen as a horrible thing. While parents and teachers and administrators and policy makers squawk back and forth at each other over how they shouldn’t talk about sex because we don’t want teens having sex, teens are having sex. They are having sex and not paying attention to the discussion others are having about whether their sexual activities are right or wrong. And it’s not just teenagers who are in this situation, but also unmarried adults. Even married adults sometimes falter when trying to talk about sexual activities- after being taught for so long that sex is bad, it’s hard to make a 180 turn and say sex is okay.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Our refusal to educate the public about sexual activity has put them at risk, and it’s time for us to stop worrying about whether we are encouraging sex or not, and start teaching teens (and everyone!) about how our bodies and reproduction work.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
One result from the above study should be easily resolved with education. As previously stated, one of the most common reasons for not using birth control was a woman believing that she couldn’t get pregnant. This is surely due in part to our fear mongering over pregnancy. Many people believe they have an equal chance of getting pregnant every time they have sex. In reality, <a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/pregnancy/how-pregnancy-happens-4252.htm" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">one’s chances of becoming pregnant are higher and lower at different parts of the ovulation cycle</a>. If a person has sex when they are not near ovulation, and thus does not become pregnant, this can lead to a false belief that they are unable to become pregnant. While I do not support NFP for teenagers as a way to prevent pregnancy, I highly suggest we begin educating teenagers (male and female) about the ovulation cycle, and encourage young women to track their cycles. Tracking your cycle as a young adult can lead to better understanding of your body, and help you figure out when to have your chances of becoming pregnant when trying to avoid pregnancy or when trying to create a pregnancy. Tracking your cycle can also help you notice something out of the ordinary that requires a doctor’s attention.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The other man reason for not using birth control was a lack of sexual activity. While I see nothing wrong with this, I do believe that even people who are sexually inactive should be educated on condoms and hormonal contraceptives. Anyone who is currently sexually inactive could change their mind and become sexually active, and they should be prepared for that if/when it happens. Hormonal contraception is not easy to get quickly- one usually needs a doctor’s appointment, then to actually purchase the birth control at a pharmacy, and then wait for it to take effect. While we hope sexual activity is well thought out and planned for, often it actually happens in the heat of the moment. No one should have to be risk pregnancy or STIs because they weren’t educated on effective contraception since they weren’t yet sexually active. Education should always come before activity.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
A person facing an unplanned pregnancy should not be judged for their situation or lack of education. We should not be asking the individual, “why didn’t you know better?” or “why didn’t you use birth control?” We should be asking the establishment, “why didn’t you provide proper education?” and “why did you limit access to contraceptives for this individual?” Our cultural fear and shame around sex has led to a situation where people rely on rumors whispered among friends, websites that aren’t always accurate, and even lies taught in schools practicing abstinence-only education. We need to stop hiding sexuality under the rug, and start talking about it openly and honestly.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-75934224867498001412012-10-20T11:00:00.001-04:002012-10-20T11:00:16.370-04:00Empowered Birth Awareness Week<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/09/empowered-birth-awareness-week/" target="_blank">AbortionGang.</a></div>
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Did you know that this week (September 3 – 10) is<a href="http://www.birthpower.us/eba.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> Empowered Birth Awareness Week</a>? This is actually an educational week that happens every year, starting the first Monday of each September.</div>
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Empowered Birth Awareness Week (EBAW) is all about educating the general public about birth options, birth interventions, and the risks and rewards of different types of birth. Those participating in EBAW want ALL people to be educated about birth, so that we can have the best outcomes for both mothers and babies.</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The United States is not at the top of the list for safe births. In fact, we have the <a href="http://womensenews.org/story/sisterspace/120726/lets-raise-the-volume-maternal-mortality-in-us" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">highest maternal mortality rate ofany industrialized nation</a>; women here have a<a href="http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/campaigns/demand-dignity/maternal-health-is-a-human-right/maternal-health-in-the-us" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> higher risk of dying of pregnancy related complication than 49 other countries</a>, including Kuwait, South Korea and Bulgaria. All this is true, even though we spend <a href="http://www.choicesinchildbirth.org/choices/birth/interventions" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">more money on maternal healthcare</a> than any other country.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Why is birth in America so dangerous? Perhaps it’s because it takes so long for evidence to change public policy. According to the EBAW page, it takes 20 years for proven research to be implemented in practice. We spend money on birth, but are we spending it in the right places, on the right practices? The World Health Organization recommends that c-section rates be at 15%, yet <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/wellness/pregnancy/story/2011/07/C-section-rate-in-US-climbs-to-all-time-high/49607756/1" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">the USA c-section rate is 34%</a>, and higher in some individual hospitals, even getting so high as <a href="http://www.cesareanrates.com/top-ten-slideshow" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">61.8% of births in 2010 at South Miami Hospital</a>. C-sections are more expensive than vaginal deliveries, and actually have<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/10/31/us-csection-risk-idUSSAT17412420071031" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> twice the risk for the mother and bab</a>y when the infant is positioned correctly.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Routine c-sections aren’t the only problem EBAW sees in our maternal healthcare. EBAW seeks to empower pregnant people, doctors, hospitals and the general public to fight back against routine procedures and ask, is this procedure necessary? Is this good for the woman and her baby? Will this cause more harm than good? Each birth situation is unique, and therefore should be treated uniquely, not as part of a factory assembly line. Many people assume that birth is routine and safe, and they fail to research the different procedures and risks. EBAW hopes to encourage families to take ownership of their pregnancy and birth by doing all the research, finding the best birth place, method, and provider for them, and thus getting the best outcome possible.</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
For many people, the meaning of EBAW is to educate the general population. But for some women, EBAW can have a bigger meaning: whether or not they will give birth in chains.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The United States has a large female inmate population. Being in prison does not stop or prevent pregnancy. Women who become pregnant in prison or who enter prison while pregnant end up facing extremely dangerous situations where their rights are ignored and their bodies are harmed. Sometimes, the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/26/born-in-chains-american-way-birth-prison" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">medical needs of pregnant women are ignored</a>, leading to miscarriages and stillbirths. Other women are moved to a medical facility to give birth, only to be chained to a bed by both hands and both feet. Only 16 of our 50 states have any regulation against women giving birth in shackles and chains. And even some of those states <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/06/women-born-free-give-birth-in-chains" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">still practice shackling women</a> even though it’s illegal. The American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are both against this practice, but there is little publicity about it, and thus, it is very hard to make any progress to stop it. Luckily, there are organizations like the <a href="http://theprisonbirthproject.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Prison Birth Project</a>, which is working to help these women.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
EBAW started on Monday with rallies across the United States called Improving Birth National Rally. Mothers, fathers, children and their advocates joined together in front of hospitals (who often welcomed them and provided refreshments and bathrooms) to educate the public. It continues with supporters sharing information through facebook, twitter, blogs and in person communication. The more people who share data, the more lives we can reach- and perhaps, save. If you want to get involved, visit <a href="http://www.improvingbirth.org/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Improving Birth</a> and <a href="http://www.birthpower.us/IdeasForPromotingEmpoweredBirthAwarenessWeek.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Birth Power</a>.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-58697662430184736212012-10-20T10:59:00.000-04:002012-10-20T10:59:30.883-04:00We Need Abortion Information to be Safe, Legal & Accessible.<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/08/we-need-information-about-abortion-to-be-safe-legal-and-accessible/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
In the past, anti-choice activists were clear with their message: abortion is murder and must be made illegal, full stop. When this method proved to be a failure, they started coming up with new methods that they are using to ban abortion piece by piece.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
One such method is to claim that abortion is dangerous to a woman physically or mentally, and therefore there need to be regulations put on it. These regulations include waiting periods, forced ultrasounds, wider clinic hallways, forcing doctors to have privileges at a nearby hospital (even if they’re completely trained and capable of doing their job without said privileges) and more. Anti-choicers push these regulations forward in the name of women’s health and safety.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But the truth is, these regulations make abortion MORE dangerous. These regulations hurt women because they push women towards do-it-yourself abortions, online pills and over the border pharmacists. A recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/us/looking-to-mexico-for-an-alternative-to-the-abortion-clinic.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">New York Times</a> piece stated that women are leaving the United States to buy pills in Mexico that can cause abortions (usually within the first 9 weeks of pregnancy). These pills are sold by unlicensed, untrained pharmacy workers who cannot provide the proper instructions on how to take the pills. As the article says,</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #666666; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 10px 30px; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Like many Progreso pharmacy workers, Mr. Acosta does not hold a pharmacy degree or a license but is allowed under Mexican law to dispense Cytotec [a pill that can induce an abortion]. Asked about the proper dosage, he reluctantly suggested that patients take one pill every two hours — 18 tablets in all.</div>
<div style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
According to the World Health Organization, the recommended dosage of misoprostol, if used alone for an abortion, should be four tablets (800 micrograms) every three hours for a total of three doses, or 12 tablets.”</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This lack of information about how to use the pills can lead to dangerous situations (indeed, ANY drug taken in a way that isn’t recommended can lead to adverse effects, not just abortion-related drugs). Some women take too few, and fail to abort the pregnancy. Some women take too many pills, which leads to excessive bleeding and trips to the emergency room. Either way, it’s not a good situation for the women involved. But they choose it. Why? One woman in the article stated she chose to self-administer the pills because she was trying to avoid the invasive and expensive regulations anti-choicers put on to abortion in the USA.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Now, we must clarify one thing. It is not the abortion pill that is dangerous; the pill, if used correctly, is <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1653411,00.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">completely safe</a>. The danger and risk is associated with having a pharmacist unable to instruct women in how to take these pills properly. Anti-choicers hope that if no one knows how to perform an abortion, or how many pills to take, women will stop aborting. But this is not true–women continue to obtain abortions <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/12/4/gpr120402.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">even in countries where it is illegal</a> or access is restricted.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
There are some pro-choice organizations that are out there working to combat the lack of information on the abortion pill. One such group is Women on Waves, which travels to countries where abortion is illegal and provides information and access to safe abortion methods. Women on Waves believes that women are capable of self-administering their own abortion using misoprostal and mifepristone, when they are educated in the proper usage. Any woman with internet access can actually go to the <a href="http://www.womenonwaves.org/en/page/702/in-collection/2588/how-to-do-an-abortion-with-pills" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Women on Waves website</a> and learn the proper method to take the pills.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
When faced with the idea that women will seek “back-alley” or “DIY” abortions when legal abortion is too difficult to access, anti-choicers have two common responses: they either refuse to believe this will happen, or they believe it and do not care. While I have little hope for militant antis who blame women for injuries related to self-induced abortions, I am hopeful that hearing that women resort to DIY abortions might change the views of the antis who refused to believe this would happen. Perhaps when faced with this reality, they will see that women need abortion, and information about abortion, to be legal, safe, and accessible.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-38461247184265298452012-08-20T18:04:00.001-04:002012-08-20T18:04:14.247-04:00The real problem with girls and gendercide.<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/06/the-real-problem-with-girls-and-gendercide/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
There has been a <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/05/29/son-preference-and-sex-selection-in-america" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">lot </a>of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bill-banning-sex-selection-abortions-fails-in-the-house/2012/05/31/gJQAaWFd5U_story.html" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">talk </a>about sex-selection and abortion in the news lately. Anti-choicers have created misleading videos to lie about Planned Parenthood’s stance on sex-selective abortions, <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/05/29/prenda-pretenda-hr-3541-is-an-attack-on-asian-american-women-and-we-know-it" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">PRENDA</a> (a bill that would outlaw sex-selective abortions) was facing a vote, and some twitter users have begun using the term “gendercide.”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But the real issue here isn’t sex-selection. The real issue is that anti-choicers don’t believe that women and girls are capable of taking care of their own lives.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
While this extreme level of obsession with female fetuses is new, anti-choicers have long used the female fetus as a symbol for “someone in need.” Their own version of a “damsel in distress,” if you will. The thinking goes like this: people want to take care of those whom they believe are helpless. For a long time, women and girls were thought to be weaker than men and boys, incapable of taking care of themselves. That’s why women in decades past were not allowed to own property, or were themselves property of their fathers and husbands. If anti-choicers can convince you that women are still incapable of taking care of themselves, they might be able to convince you to step in and “help.”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
We’ve come a long way since women were property in America. We now know that women and girls are just as capable as men and boys. Anything men can do, women can do. We can own property, vote, and even run for President if we like (whether we can win is another story).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But anti-choicers haven’t caught up with us, and they’re hoping they can bank on that historical sense of “need to help the helpless” people might still feel. And because they believe girls are weak and helpless, they use that to their supposed advantage. This is why sidewalk harassers tell women that their “baby girl” needs them to choose life, or why every anti-choice fetus is a “she” with “her” this and that. It’s even why those creepy stories written to be seen from the point of view of a fetus to their “mommy” is a written by a female fetus.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It’s also why many anti-choicers say that the women who choose abortion shouldn’t be punished, because they were mislead and ignorant and didn’t know what they were doing.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Anti-choicers aren’t worried about sex-selection because they value women and girls; on the contrary, they are worried about sex-selection because they think it will help them take away more rights from women. I find it hard to believe that any anti-choicer would actually care if girls are aborted for their gender, with how little respect they often show for women. Instead, I see this as another slap in the face. Anti-choicers are pretending to care about my gender so that they can hurt my gender more.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This type of behavior must be recognized, called out, and stopped. We must show that we value, respect and trust women and girls to make the correct, moral choices for their lives. Only by valuing women as capable moral agents can we teach others that women are of value.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-78714148525880295602012-08-20T18:03:00.001-04:002012-08-20T18:03:09.925-04:00What does the Gallup poll on abortion really mean?<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Originally posted at <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/05/what-does-the-gallup-poll-on-abortion-really-mean/" target="_blank">AbortionGang</a>. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It’s that time of year again–<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-Americans-Record-Low.aspx" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Gallup Poll</a> season! Which means it’s also the season of “anti-choicers claiming and celebrating their majority.”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
We’ve talked about before how antichoicers are only interested in how they look, not what good they actually do (See Mississippi Representative Lester “Bubba” Carpenter <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/05/17/bubba-and-his-poor-pitiful-women" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">admitting</a> he doesn’t care if women die as long as abortion is illegal). The Gallup poll rejoicing is another one of those situations. This year’s<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-Americans-Record-Low.aspx" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">poll</a> shows that 50% of those polled identify as “pro-life,” and 41% identify as “pro-choice.” This is a change from last year’s 49% prochoice and 45% prolife.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Now, this might sound like a serious problem to some pro-choice advocates. However, one needs to look further into the polling to see the real situation.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
52% of Americans believe that abortion should be legal under some circumstances. An additional 25% believe it should be legal under any circumstances. Together, that means a whole<strong style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> 77% of Americans support abortion being legal.</strong> In contrast, only 20% believe abortion should always be illegal (and that’s down 2% from last year!).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Obviously, this is a case of people <a href="http://abortiongang.org/author/KushielsMoon/(http://www.indecisionforever.com/blog/2012/05/23/record-number-of-americans-dont-understand-what-pro-choice-means" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">not understanding</a> what “pro-choice” and “pro-life” really mean.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Now, are some of the people who think abortion should be legal “sometimes” perhaps prolife? Yes. But <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/05/a-question-for-anti-choicers/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">we asked</a> antis last year if they would really accept people who found abortion to be okay sometimes (if you truly believe abortion is murder, would you be okay with people saying ‘sure, murder is acceptable sometimes?’). My feeling is that no, the leaders of the anti-choice movement do not want those on the fence people. So really, they’re celebrating a hollow victory.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Pro-choicers, on the other hand, do have something to celebrate. Even with all the numerous attacks across state lines against abortion, birth control and freedom, support for abortion hasn’t declined. The number of people who think abortion should be legal in all circumstances hasn’t fallen below 23% in at least 10 years. The number of people who think it should be legal in some circumstances has steadily hung out in the 50-58%. As Gallup says, “it is notable that while Americans’ labeling of their position has changed, their fundamental views on the issue have not..”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; margin-bottom: 15px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Perhaps people are more worried about calling themselves “pro-choice” in an environment of constant anti-choice attacks.Or, perhaps we are taking back the pro-life label–because <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/10/being-pro-choice-actually-makes-you-pro-life/" style="background-color: transparent; border: 0px; color: #3b0466; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">we are pro-life when we are pro-choice</a>. We are saving, supporting, and creating lives. And that is something we should always celebrate.</div>
Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-28902634715274732662012-05-09T16:16:00.001-04:002012-05-09T16:17:30.649-04:00White House Tours and FetusesOriginally posted on <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/05/white-house-tours-and-fetuses/">AbortionGang blog.</a><br />
The White House wants you to register your fetus as a person when you take a tour.<br />
<br />
Or do they?<br />
<br />
Anti-choicers have been lighting Twitter up with tweets and links to post talking about how the White House wants you to register your “unborn child” if you’re going on a tour. The antichoicers have been talking about this as mixed messaging, acknowledgement of a fetus as a person, and other silly hoopla.
However, what they’re not tweeting is the full story.<br />
<br />
Luckily, <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/08/national-right-life-committee/obama-white-house-security-unborn-babies/">Politifact</a> was nice enough to post about this topic. Here’s the part the anti-choicers probably won’t tell you:<br />
<blockquote>
“Schafer’s email was an explanation of how to fill out information for pregnant women who will bring their new baby on future White House tours. ” said Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan.</blockquote>
<br />
In other words, if you are going on a tour of the White House on June 1st, they want to you include every person who will be on the tour on June 1st, including your newborn infant… even if today is May 1st and you’re still pregnant with this to-be newborn infant.
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
“I know people are construing it as an unborn child, but the visit isn’t occurring (now). If a pregnant woman shows up at the White House, we don’t count two people. It’s sort of a way of expediting (the process) so no one gets hung up at the gate,” he said.</blockquote>
<br />
So the White House doesn’t need you to register your fetus if you’re going on a tour while still pregnant. However, if you are going to give birth in between the time you register for a tour and the time you take a tour, it would be very helpful if you would include your to-be child in your list of people.There is no disconnect at the White House between recognizing fetuses for security and for rights. Because this isn’t about fetuses; it’s about infants. This recognition of an infant before it is born is the same thing most women do when they have a baby shower before they give birth. It’s part of living in a world with a linear timeline. Anti-choicers should stop acting like this is some sort of meaningful sign in the abortion debate, and start seeing it for what it is: a matter of convenience for families visiting the White House.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-87266613567862488312012-01-18T11:48:00.000-05:002012-01-18T11:50:12.593-05:00Christians Can Support 10 for Tebow TooCrossposted from <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2012/01/christians-can-support-10-for-tebow-too/">AbortionGang</a>.<br /><br />Hi. I’m a writer here at AbortionGang. I’m also a Christian. Nice to meet you!<br /><br />It seems that a lot of press around our recent #10forTebow campaign is suggesting that we hate God, or Christians, or Jesus, or faith. This is simply not true.<br /><br />If you take a second look at Sophia’s <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/12/when-sports-and-anti-abortion-messages-collide-and-what-to-do-about-it/">original post</a>, you’ll see she never says a single bad thing about Christianity. She may laugh at Tebow’s excessive focus on his faith, but that is entirely about Tebow’s actions, not the religion he follows.<br /><br />Some people may believe that being antichoice and Christian go hand in hand- to attack one is to attack the other. This also is untrue. Taking a stand against being antichoice is not taking a stand against Christianity.<br /><br />Christianity has been separated into many different organized religions, and some Christians choose to create their own faith, outside of organized religion. I am not here to say which group or type is a/the True Christian, but I do want to point out that this diversity means there is a diversity of beliefs among Christians related to abortion.<br /><br />One of the first abortion funds ever established was created by ministers, who were counseling women with problem pregnancies, and seeing the horrible effects of back-alley abortions. These ministers worked together to direct women to medically-safe abortion locations, and eventually they raised the money to fund an abortion clinic in their area. In this way, Christians were some of the first supporters of abortion funding, and keeping women safe.<br /><br />Christians today continue to support a woman’s right to choose. There are many Christian organizations and denominations that have spoken up for women and their families: Catholics for Choice, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, The United Methodist Church, the United Church of Christ, and more.<br /><br />Christians have a long history of supporting choice, and we will continue to support choice in the future. Being prochoice does not mean one hates God, or is against faith. Donating to an abortion fund as part of the #10forTebow campaign is one more way that Christians can do good in their community and help their fellow human, as God has asked us to. This campaign is for everyone who disagrees with Tebow’s antichoice position, not just atheists or agnostics who disagree with him.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-17205316790476209352012-01-18T11:45:00.001-05:002012-01-18T11:48:36.817-05:00What does HHS really think of young people?Crossposted from <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/12/what-does-hhs-really-think-of-young-people/">AbortionGang</a>.<br /><br />Yesterday, the US Department of Health and Human Services <a href="http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2011/12/07/et-tu-sebelius-hhs-secretary-blocks-over-the-counter-plan-b/">announced</a> that they are blocking Plan B from being sold on pharmacy shelves to whoever needs it. This goes against FDA recommendations to remove all restrictions to accessing Plan B, including lifting age restrictions and requiring Plan B to be sold on pharmacy shelves instead of behind-the-counter.<br /><br />Plan B One-Step is a brand of morning after pill, which works the same way as birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. It’s more effective the earlier it’s taken, but can be taken up to 72 hours after sex. Plan B cannot terminate a pregnancy- -it is not an abortion pill. Plan B is currently available over the counter to people 17 years old and older. Anyone under 17 must go to the doctor and get a prescription before they can get Plan B.<br /><br />Plan B is extremely safe, and as the FDA’s approval has shown, there is no reason for it to be locked away. <a href="http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf">A report released this month</a> makes this clear, stating that “no deaths or serious complications have been causally links to emergency contraceptive. According to the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, there are no situations in which the risks of using [emergency contraceptive pills] outweigh the benefits.” Compare that to the <a href="http://psychcentral.com/news/archives/2004-07/jws-tdo072004.html">450 deaths</a> from liver failure in 2004 due to an overdose of acetaminophen,the drug found in Tylenol. And yet walk into any pharmacy and you’ll find Tylenol available over the counter.<br /><br />Although it’s clear that Plan B is safe for women and girls of all ages, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the FDA’s medically-based, scientifically accurate decision. In her <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2011pres/12/20111207a.pdf">very brief memorandum</a>, Secretary Sebelius claims to worry about the 10% of girls who begin ovulating by 11.1 years old. Yet she doesn’t seem to suggest a problem of health, but instead “significant cognitive and behavioral differences between older adolescent girls and the youngest girls of reproductive age.” It seems that she is suggesting that young teens would not understand how to use Plan B, or that they would not act in a mature enough manner for Plan B.<br /><br />This attitude is extremely condescending. No one fears that teenagers, even young teenagers, will not know how to use or will misuse Tylenol or Benadryl or Aleve, and thus should not have access to them. Even more damning is that condoms ARE available on the shelves. If we can trust people of any age to buy condoms, why can’t we trust them to buy Plan B? I am willing to bet that anyone 12, 13, or 14 years old who is going into a drugstore to buy Plan B is buying it because they need it. Young teens can’t drive and often don’t have large disposable incomes, so many would be purchasing Plan B with the help of their parents, older sibling, or friend. And if you don’t live in a city with easy public transportation, it takes a lot of effort for someone under the legal driving age to get to a drugstore without their parent’s knowledge; this is not something you’d do on a dare.<br /><br />Young teenagers know about sex. They see it in our media, they hear about it in school (despite abstinence-only efforts) and they learn about it from their parents or friends. Plan B is a time sensitive medicine that is used after something has gone wrong. Whether that something is rape, a broken condom, or drunken, unprotected sex is important, but not so important as to block access to Plan B. If we’re worried about the “cognitive and behavioral differences” of young teens, we need to work on putting comprehensive sex education into schools, not taking away access to a safe medication.<br /><br />It’s hard to understand how the Secretary thought there was good reason to contradict the FDA, especially when many clinicians, members of Congress, reproductive rights advocates and healthcare professionals saw no evidence to prevent Plan B from being over-the-counter. In fact, the effort to make emergency contraception available to all people of reproductive age started six years ago. In 2005, Susan Wood resigned from the FDA because of delays in approving Plan B over the counter. Today, she’s quoted in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/obama-administration-refuses-to-relax-plan-b-restrictions/2011/12/07/gIQAF5HicO_story.html">Washington Post</a>, saying:<br /><blockquote><br />“There is no rationale that can justify HHS reaching in and overturning the FDA on the decision about this safe and effective contraception. I never thought I’d see this happen again.”</blockquote>Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-77618993763229217952012-01-18T11:43:00.001-05:002012-01-18T11:45:27.538-05:00Abortion, Disability, and CoercionCrossposted from <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/10/abortion-disability-and-coercion/">AbortionGang</a>.<br /><br />I recently read an <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2053946/Having-amnio-test-ruined-life-Bullied-abortion-bitterly-regrets-Downs-dilemma-mother-dreads-tore-family-apart.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">article</a> on the DailyMail website which has me infuriated.<br />Six years ago, a woman in the UK learned she was pregnant and the fetus had Down syndrome. While the woman and her husband were confused and nervous about coping with a child with special needs (on top of caring for their other six children), they never considered having an abortion. They wanted to continue the pregnancy and give birth.<br /><br />And yet the woman had an abortion.<br /><br />According to the article (and we have to take the Daily Mail with a grain of salt), she and her husband were bullied by their doctors and nurses. When they went in to discuss how “to be prepared for the fact we might have a disabled child,” the nurse only counseled her on a termination. The nurse continuously pushed abortion even after the couple told her they wanted to continue the pregnancy. Eventually, with a nurse and a consultant bombarding her to terminate, the woman was in a state of shock, and began the abortion.<br /><br />This is infuriating. This is disgusting. This is anti-choice.<br /><br />There are actually two problems going on here. First, there is discrimination against people with special needs. As a pro-choice advocate, I support a woman’s right to choose. Without taking away that support, I also question why so many people are afraid to have a child with special needs. In <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.34293/full">recent studies</a>, researchers have found that 79% of the responding parents “felt their outlook on life was more positive” because of having a child with Down syndrome. In fact, “only 4% said they felt sad about their life.” While more challenging at times, life with a child with special needs is not the horror story many people imagine.<br /><br />The difference between the viewpoints of families with children who have Down syndrome, and the women who are considering termination because of Down syndrome is huge. It leads me to question if the pregnant women are fully informed about their decisions, or if they’re just basing their ideas on popular cultural views (I am not trying to imply that women are choosing termination lightly or ignorantly–just that people in positions of power are not giving them the full picture, and they have no way of knowing this).<br /><br />The way to fix this is clear: stop discriminating against people with special needs. Instead, value those with special needs within our society. Do not just try to make them fit in, but let them excel, stand out and be leaders. In this way, we<br />can make having a special needs child less terrifying than it seems to be today.<br />If the above seems like a daunting task, we can always start smaller. Host educational seminars for OB/GYNs about how to support a family that’s going to have a special needs child. Form resource networks between doctors and Down syndrome support groups, so an pregnant woman has someone she can talk to about what to expect. These are simple steps to ensuring that women are fully informed, so they can decide the absolute best choice for their family.<br /><br />The second issue at hand is the violation of this woman’s right to choose. Forcing or coercing a woman into abortion Is. Not. Pro. Choice. This is an anti-choice behavior. Any pro-choice person who sees someone trying to coerce a woman into a specific decision should immediately speak up against this action. Every pro-choice person should be just as quick to stand up for a woman’s right to continue to term as (s)he is for a woman’s right to terminate.<br /><br />Anti-choicers are quick to pick up an article like this and claim it proves abortion is absolute evil. Yet it is clear that our world is not that black and white. What the article proves is wrong is coercive practices. For some women, abortion is the wrong choice, while for other women birth is the wrong choice. Neither event- abortion nor birth- is bad in and of itself. But both can be bad when forced upon the woman. This is why antipchoicers are wrong when they call us “pro-abortion” and mean that we only want women to abort. I most certainly do not want every woman to abort. I want every woman to make whichever choice is best for themselves and their families, and to have the support and access to complete that choice.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-85102823018702750492012-01-18T11:41:00.000-05:002012-01-18T11:42:26.217-05:00Trying Not to Erase Grief: Miscarriage and AbortionCrossposted from <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/07/trying-not-to-erase-grief-miscarriage-and-abortion/">AbortionGang</a>.<br /><br />Over here at the AbortionGang we recently came across a tumblr post about the “baby vs. fetus” debate that ends with the following:<br /><br /><blockquote>So while we are wont to scream so loudly that a fetus is not a baby and therefore it is not murder for the person carrying them to decide for themselves if they wish to continue to do so or not – and I agree with this – could we take a moment to realize that saying they are not babies also erases the experience of people who miscarry and are grieving over their loss(es)?</blockquote><br /><br />I think this is extremely important and something all feminists and pro-choicers should consider.<br /><br />As the anti-choicers continue to propose and pass antichoice legislation, post racist, anti-choice billboards and try to send women to jail for having abortions, I believe the political pro-choice stance and the personal abortion stories are becoming more and more distant. Listening and considering the real lives of women who have abortions and women who deal with fetal loss will help us stay grounded against the insanity of the anti-choice position.<br /><br />Legally, fetuses are not infants, are not considered persons, and thus, having an abortion is not murder. But we must remember, the personal is different from the legal. Pregnancy is different for every single woman- and one woman may experience multiple pregnancies in very different ways. A woman may consider her fetus to be ababy, or already a person, because she plans to carry to term. Another woman may consider her fetus to be a baby even though she is planning to have an abortion. Those feelings and beliefs are normal, valid, and should be perfectly acceptable.<br /><br />Using the term “baby” doesn’t hurt the pro-choice position at all. If a woman believes that abortion is the best option for her baby, then we should support her in her choice.** It does us no good to get into a battle over the word (the same applies if she wants to carry her fetus to term).<br /><br />On the other end of the spectrum are women who have lost pregnancies, both wanted and unwanted, planned and unplanned, through miscarriage. Just as with abortion, some women may feel relieved and think of the fetus as just a fetus. Other women may feel they lost a member of their family. None of these feelings hurt the pro-choice position, and all should be taken into consideration when we’re writing, blogging, speaking and protesting.<br /><br />I always try to make an effort to let the woman in question decide what type of language will be used, and allow her feelings to control the situation instead of mine. For her, my opinion on the baby vs. fetus debate isn’t relevant. Making sure she feels loved and supported is most important.<br /><br />**This does not only apply to women terminating wanted pregnancies due to fetal abnormalities.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-12098390682277896052012-01-18T11:40:00.001-05:002012-01-18T11:41:00.872-05:00Choosing Birth after RapeCrossposted from the <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/06/choosing-birth-after-rape/">AbortionGang</a>.<br /><br />I would like to give an often ignored perspective of rape, pregnancy and abortion (this is your trigger warning, though I don’t plan to be graphic).<br /><br />I often see tweets, blog posts and comments from women and men (and people who identify as neither of the above) sharing their horror at the thought of carrying a pregnancy conceived in rape to term. They proudly and strongly say they support abortion, because it’s horrific, gruesome, disgusting, and cruel to force a woman to carry to term after she was raped (or, “give birth to her rapist’s child”). Now maybe I’m not paying attention, but it seems that all of the feminist discussion around rape and pregnancy decisions is focused around how awful it is for women to give birth after rape. Yet one study in 1996 (old, but the only reliable one I could find) said 32.2% of raped women chose to birth and keep the child (50% had abortions, 5.9% participated in adoption and 11.8% had miscarriages). 32% is a substantial portion of women that it seems many feminist forget about.<br /><br />I 100% agree that it’s wrong to force a woman to carry to term when she wants to abort.<br /><br />But I have to wonder: how does this type of language (horrific, disgusting, cruel) affect women who choose to carry to term after rape?<br /><br />I wonder how a single mother of a beautiful two year old who happened to be conceived from rape feels when she reads that it’s “barbaric” to “force a woman to give birth to the child of her rapist.” Does she feel like she was supported in her choice? Doubtful.<br /><br />We always need to be considerate of who we talk about and who we talk to. While it may seem clear that the barbaric part is the force of rape, denying the woman her access to decide to have sex, if we only talk about how wrong it is to force birth instead of how wrong it is to force abortion, or force any unwanted choice, then others may start reading it as the birth of a child as disgusting. And I certainly hope no one actually thinks choosing to give birth is disgusting.<br /><br />I know a lot of this language choice is based upon our hatred of rape, and it would make sense to have a second discussion about rape here, but I’m not going to do that. All I ask is that we default to the individual woman’s opinion before we share our own feelings when dealing with issues of pregnancy, abortion and rape, because everyone should feel supported in their decisions.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-83699388794852796382011-05-28T12:06:00.001-04:002011-05-28T12:07:24.757-04:00Ralph Lang, Attempted Anti-Choice Terrorist<span style="font-style:italic;">Cross posted from <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/05/ralph-lang-attempted-anti-choice-terrorist/">AbortionGang</a>.</span><br /><br /><br />Thank God, or Lady Luck, or whomever you like: yesterday reports went out of a man arrested BEFORE he murdered a law-abiding doctor, instead of after.<br /><br />The quick details: Ralph Lang, 63, drove up to Madison with a gun with the clear intention of murdering at least one abortion-providing doctor, and possibly other nurses and employees. His handgun discharged while he was at a motel, and the police were called. Upon hearing his plans, he was taken into custody.<br /><br />I’m so thankful that Lang’s gun went off in his motel room. I’m also thankful he wasn’t “100 percent in sync with God” when he was in Madison last week and didn’t kill anyone. I’m thankful that he didn’t get to go to the clinic, “line [the employees] up all in a row, get a machine gun, and mow them all down” as he said he wished he could.<br /><br />The other information you should know: Ralph Lang is not a “lone wolf” or a “fringe member” of the antichoice “pro-life” community. He is a sidewalk counselor (read: harasser) and was arrested previously in 2007 outside of a Planned Parenthood. He was part of a Catholic prayer vigil (read: more sidewalk harassment) in 2006, at which time he said, “it’s nice to be a part of a movement like this.” I’m sure as we learn more details we will see more connections between Ralph Lang and well known anti-choice groups.<br /><br />Of course, Lang’s language is gleamed from common anti-choice propaganda. He planned “to lay out abortionists because they are killing babies”- words used by many so-called peaceful anti-choicers. These ‘peaceful’ antis claim they don’t actually want anyone hurt, yet continue to repeat these phrases until they’ve convinced someone- like Ralph Lang, or Scott Roeder- to do the dirty work for them. When they call doctors murderers over and over and over again, they set the kindling and strike the match for others to take those words and follow through with them.<br /><br />It’s long past time for antichoicers to stop their violent rhetoric. It was long past time two years ago, when Dr. George Tiller was murdered in his church. It was long past time in 1998 when Dr. Slepian and a security guard were killed, in 1994 when two clinic receptionists, Dr Britton and an escort were killed, in 1993 when Dr. Gunn was murdered. It’s been nearly 20 years of murders- when will anti-choicers actually take a prolife stance and stop the violence?Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-51535595346590141902011-02-08T22:21:00.002-05:002011-02-08T22:22:32.912-05:00Sex Trafficking and Clinic Responsibility: What Would You Do?Originally posted at the <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/02/sex-trafficking-and-clinic-responsibility-what-would-you-do/">AbortionGang</a> site.<br /><br />If you were an employee at a reproductive health care clinic and someone came in and asked you about obtaining abortions for women being sex trafficked, what would you do?<br /><br />Here’s what I would do: Lie. Lie, lie, and then lie some more.<br /><br />Why?<br /><br />There’s one thing for certain: If you tell the person “No, we will not give these women healthcare” then you will never be able to find them. You will never be able to help them get out of being trafficked, help them get their lives back.<br /><br />And if you tell this person “That’s against the law! I’m calling the cops!”- then you might just lose your life.<br /><br />Everyone knows that in a bank robbery, you’re supposed to do whatever the bank robber tells you. The bank robber doesn’t care about the law or your life, (s)he just wants the money and to escape. Doing anything to prevent that puts you in danger.<br /><br />The same thing applies with someone who trafficks people. This person abuses women for their bodies- (s)he’s not interested in your morals or the law.<br /><br />The BEST way to ensure those trafficked girls are found? Lie. Tell the person that you can provide the girls with healthcare services, that you wont tell anyone, that its all perfectly legal. And then after the meeting, go tell your superiors and the law enforcement. When the person comes again with the women (s)he is trafficking, law enforcement can be there to arrest the person. The girls can be provided with healthcare (which they will need), counseling, a place to stay, etc. Dare I sound too forward- they can be rescued.<br /><br />Of course, if the person coming in to ask about healthcare for sex trafficked women is really just a fake undercover anti-choicer, this type of situation may lead the employee and the clinic to look bad.<br /><br />But personally, I’d rather look bad and rescue women from sex trafficking than look good and never have the chance to save them. Being a reproductive justice activist isn’t about looking good, it’s about helping other people.<br /><br />What would you do in this type of situation?Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com37tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-30030943841200059882011-01-21T09:06:00.003-05:002011-01-21T09:29:02.710-05:00Blog for Choice: What is choice?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqzb8mytxWxtwbG3abXaeEhQNVLWqtyBjINSUmBMOQmSQMwrMvc3hE9JMPtWEPKp6Irx8slkcCTxpif3OwzZQMlctSvBATlfAA3r-ac5JUa5VcUDhiAUGS6bw_eX2Z_PJ8tLb2v_EM70SQ/s1600/bfcd-2011.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 150px; height: 185px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqzb8mytxWxtwbG3abXaeEhQNVLWqtyBjINSUmBMOQmSQMwrMvc3hE9JMPtWEPKp6Irx8slkcCTxpif3OwzZQMlctSvBATlfAA3r-ac5JUa5VcUDhiAUGS6bw_eX2Z_PJ8tLb2v_EM70SQ/s400/bfcd-2011.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5564645544046662898" /></a><br /><br /><br />Today is Blog for Choice day. While there is a question that has been put out by prochoicers for us to answer, the antis have come up with what they consider a clever "come back" in which they ask "What is choice?"<br /><br />Well, why not answer that straight off the bat? <br /><br /><blockquote>Definitions of choice on the Web:<br /><br /> * the act of choosing or selecting; "your choice of colors was unfortunate"; "you can take your pick" </blockquote><br /><br />When I say I support choice, that means I support each individual woman's ability to make a decision (after being informed of risks/benefits) about how she is going to responsibly care for her pregnancy. <br /><br />When she first becomes pregnant, that usually means she is choosing between having an abortion and giving birth. If she chooses to have an abortion, then she gets to make a decision whether she wants to have a medical or a surgical abortion. She gets to choose the safest clinic setting for her (I would like to see there be no Hyde amendment forcing women into clinics like Gosnell's) and has someone she trusts to provide whatever she needs (driving, food, hugs, whatever). <br /><br />If she chooses to carry to term, then she gets to make a decision about whether she wants to use a midwife or an OB/GYN. She chooses between a homebirth, hospital birth and birthing center. She chooses whether to have an all natural birth, whether to use an epidural, whether to be induced. <br /><br /><br />Towards the end of the pregnancy, if she has chosen to carry to term, she must make a decision about whether she wants to keep the infant after birth or give it up for adoption. If she chooses adoption, she gets to decide if she wants an open or closed adoption. She gets to choose which adoptive family her child will become a part of. If she chooses to raise the infant herself, she gets to choose her parenting style: will she breastfeed, co-sleep or babywear? <br /><br /><br />Of course, there are also choices to be made before a woman becomes pregnant. She has to choose what type of contraceptive (and I include abstinence among them) she wants to use, for instance.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />As you can see, choice is about so many different things. But in the end, it really all comes down to supporting one thing: Trusting women to make the best decisions for themselves and their families when they're fully informed of all the risks and benefits associated with the possible options. This is Choice.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com24tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-5383810370118867662011-01-17T14:49:00.001-05:002011-01-17T14:52:25.938-05:00Sec-Selective Abortions and FeminismThis post was originally written for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2011/01/sex-selective-abortions-and-feminism/">The Abortion Gang</a>.<br /><br /><br />Anti-choicers are always trying to trick pro-choicers into saying something that makes them look bad. One such example is when anti-choicers bring up sex-selective abortions. “If you support girls/women, how can you support sex-selective abortions!?!” they ask (Don’t get me started on the fact that you cannot abort a woman. Physically impossible). They don’t ask these questions because they’re interested in reducing sex-selective abortions; they’re just interested in making pro-choicers seem coldhearted.<br /><br />But what if they did want to reduce sex-selective abortions? How would they go about doing that? Pro-choice, of course, already has the answer: Feminism.<br /><br />Sex-selective abortions happen because the pregnant woman’s culture favors one sex over the other- usually, male over female*. For instance, in China, families will abort a female fetus or abandon a female infant because they want a male infant. Males stay with the family, and carry on the family name while females are married off to another family and basically lose their birth family. For this reason, males are valued higher than females. And for this reason, sex- selective abortions occur.<br /><br />This is where feminism comes in. Feminism says that both sexes are equal in value and worth. Men and women, with their differences and similarities, are not better than one another but standing on an equal plane. If feminist ideas were to become culturally normal, sex-selective abortions would not occur. Families would value and appreciate a fetus they wanted regardless of its sex. Not only would this apply to fetuses, but to children as well; families would be just as glad to have a daughter as they would be to have a son.<br /><br />On top of that, feminism would give the opinions of women equal weight to men. Who knows- maybe women in China and other countries don’t want to have sex selective abortions, but their culture pressures them into that decision? Supporting feminism would support women who choose to not have a sex-selective abortion.<br /><br />So next time an anti-choicer asks you what you think of sex-selective abortions, ask them right back: “What are you doing to prevent sex-selection?” Then ask them to support feminism, so that males and females will be valued equally.<br /><br />* I understand there are other situations involved such as intersex –this post is a simple overview. I welcome others to write about the issues of feminism, sex-selection and intersex.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com11tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-55678279672270783532010-12-11T18:38:00.001-05:002010-12-11T18:39:37.868-05:00Antis Will Not Take Responsibility.<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was originally posted on <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/12/antis-will-not-take-responsibility/">AbortionGang.org</a>.</span><br /><br />Antichoicers are always talking about how women need to take responsibility. They say women should take responsibility for avoiding pregnancy either by not having sex or using contraceptives (though only a few mention the latter). They say women who are pregnant have to take responsibility by carrying to term (never mind that having an abortion is taking responsibility). They attack women who they deem have not taken responsibility (women who abort, women who get pregnant, women who get pregnant while taking birth control, etc).<br /><br />But do antichoicers apply their strict brand of responsibility to themselves? Of course not.<br /><br />Some anti-choicers and anti-choice groups have decided to attack Dr. Carhart as he works in a Maryland clinic. Their goal is to have Dr. Carhart kicked out of the building by the other businesses there because of the protesting. The anti-choicers figure if they hurt the other businesses enough by making a big deal with their fake abortion pictures, the businesses will think it is Dr. Carhart’s fault and ask him to leave.<br /><br />But we all know, the actions and signs of the protestors are not Dr. Carhart’s fault. He did not force any of the protestors to stand outside his clinic. This is simply a case of the anti-choicers refusing to take responsibility. They even practically say so themselves!<br /><br /><blockquote><br />“Mahoney said he’s not bringing unwanted attention to Germantown and all of Maryland, instead pointing the finger at Carhart.”</blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local-beat/Pro-Life-Activists-Protest-Late-Term-Abortion-Doc-111393034.html)">Source</a><br /><br />“Pointing the finger at Carhart.” The anti-choicers are acting like children, pointing their finger and saying “it’s his fault!” even when they are to blame. They refuse to acknowledge that THEY are the ones bringing unwanted attention to the building complex. They refuse to take responsibility for the fact that THEY are the ones waving giant fake abortion pictures all over, making people uncomfortable. If the women of Maryland did not want Dr. Carhart’s services, he would not be there. But they do need his services, and he is there- quietly and respectfully, inside the clinic.<br /><br />Anti-choicers need to take responsibility for their actions, and own up to the fact that they are the ones causing all the chaos in Maryland. Anti-choicers are the ones who are harming women trying to obtain a legal medical procedure.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-49498359669813293482010-12-11T18:35:00.002-05:002010-12-11T18:37:53.514-05:00Who Deserves to Have a Baby?<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was originally written on November 30th, 2010 for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/11/who-deserves-to-have-a-baby/">AbortionGang.org</a>.</span><br /><br /><br />It’s always interesting to look into the mind of an anti and see what they believe. The latest thing I’ve noticed is that antis have a very, very strange view of who will make good parents. Many antichoice harassers will stand outside a clinic and tell any woman walking in (whether there for a pap or an abortion consult) that she would make a great mom. They tell her she deserves to be a mother and will instantly fall in love at birth.<br /><br />Yet at the same time, a woman with a wanted pregnancy who has gone through fertility issues and miscarriages, who has researched the development of her fetus and given him a name, who has never stepped foot in or near a clinic- this woman they believe would make a horrible mother. So horrible in fact that they think her infant, once born, should be removed from her and placed up for adoption. Others have suggested that the mother has an emotional or mental illness that needs to be looked into.<br /><br />For instance, Kristen on JillStanek’s post says<br /> <blockquote>“I think they should give the baby up for adoption – they are obviously not good parents.” </blockquote><br />Aengus O’Shaughnessy replies,<br /> <blockquote>“Kristen, you are absolutely correct–these people should give the poor child to someone who will raise it properly.” </blockquote><br />Jennifer agrees: <br /><blockquote>“The bottom line is these people are already terrible, terrible parents and they don’t deserve this baby. Lord Jesus, have mercy on this innocent child and save him from his own parents. How sick and disgusting this is.”</blockquote><br /><br />What made antichoicers hate this Glenn-Beck-loving woman so much that they want to take her child away by force? The simply fact that her husband put up a hoax website inviting people to vote on whether they would abort the pregnancy or not. Both prochoice and <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/%202010/11/about-that-couple-taking-votes-whether-to-abort/">antichoice</a> [Warning, link is to Jill Stanek] websites have proven the vote is a hoax. The couple wants people to consider how important voting is.<br /><br />While I can understand an antichoicer being upset about voting on abortion, I cannot wrap my mind around the idea that anti-choicers believe it is worse than actually going to get an abortion. The only answer which looks logical from my point of view is that antis do not really want women who abort to be moms- they’re just so desperate to avoid abortion that they’ll lie to women at the clinic. This idea,unfortunately, does not lack proof.<br /><br />A number of women, including young women, have been forced and coerced into adoption by antichoice organizations. These organizations belittle and mentally abuse pregnant women into thinking they are worthless and unable to be mothers. They lie to women about being unable to care for an infant without a college education, a full time job, or a family to back her up (only, of course, after she’s passed the legal limit to abort).<br /><br />The truth is anti-choicers don’t want pro-choice people or women who abort or even women who have considered abortion to be parents. They believe these people don’t deserve to be mothers or fathers and should have their children taken away, to be given to a “better” family.<br /><br />Regardless of who the anti-choicers believe are acceptable parents, their wish that pro-choice people not be allowed to have children is cruel and wrong. Women deserve to be mothers when they want to be mothers, and not forced to give up a child just because they’re poor or uneducated or not Caucasian. Choosing to parent is just that- a parent’s choice. No one should have the right to deny a person their choice to parent.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-9344802465861263852010-12-11T18:34:00.002-05:002010-12-11T18:35:57.395-05:00Birth Control Matters<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was originally written on November 9th, 2010 for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/11/birth-control-matters/">AbortionGang.org</a>.</span><br /><br />The Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear was labeled a comedy event. But for some of the attendants, it was a chance to get out their message and find more support among the general public.<br /><br />Planned Parenthood was one such group. Now, if you were anti-choice, you might think Planned Parenthood was out there promoting abortion. The truth is, Planned Parenthood was out there doing work which will ultimately prevent abortions. Planned Parenthood was trying to get more support for birth control. And not just any birth control, but free birth control!<br /><br />Planned Parenthood currently has a campaign running called “<a href="http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/get-involved/birth-%20control-matters-935.htm">Birth Control Matters</a>.” This is a petition in favor of birth control being available for FREE under the new health care law. The health care bill has a prevention provision which requires new insurance plans to cover preventative health care for free. This is the perfect spot for birth control coverage- because birth control prevents unplanned and unwanted pregnancies.<br /><br />Lots of people were wearing the Planned Parenthood “BC Matters” sticker at the rally, even though the crowd far exceeded expectations. You can see one such gentleman wearing the sticker <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/gallery/2010/10/sanity-restored-photos-from-the-stewartcolbert-rally.php?img=59">here</a>.<br /><br />The Reproductive Rights movement isn’t just about abortion. While a legal right to obtain birth control is very important, Planned Parenthood reminds us that a legal right doesn’t help someone who can’t afford their prescription. Birth control can be expensive. Some people pay $900 or more without insurance. With insurance, people can still be paying $200 or more for pills. For a single mom who’s working two jobs just to pay the rent and feed her children, that might be too much money. For a teenager who’s parents wont let her have a job, that might be too much money. For a middle aged women who just lost her job, that might be too much money.<br /><br />Planned Parenthood cares about women. If you do as well, I’d like to request that you take two seconds and <a href="http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/get-involved/birth-control-matters-935.htm">sign the Birth Control Matters petition</a>.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-82900992301928046502010-12-11T18:30:00.000-05:002010-12-11T18:33:08.600-05:00Anti-Choicers Live Outside of Reality<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was originally written on October 20th, 2010 for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/10/anti-choicers-live-outside-of-reality/">AbortionGang.org</a>.</span><br /><br />Sometimes, when you have two different groups of people on different sides of an issue, you can explain their differences by saying that they come from different backgrounds or that they start off with a different set of assumptions. Unfortunately, that is not the case in the issue of abortion.<br /><br />The differences among prochoicers and antichoicers is whether one supports and lives in reality or not.*<br /><br />Of course, this has been obvious for a long time. One very common anti=choice lie which has no base in reality is claiming that abortion is murder. Abortion is <a href="http://dictionary.law.com/%20Default.aspx?selected=1303">clearly not murder</a> but that wont stop anti-choicers from claiming it is- over and over and over. This is an obvious separation from reality. Even when given <a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/abortion/in-clinic-abortion-procedures-4359.asp">the facts</a>, which clearly demonstrate that abortion is not murder, they will still disagree.<br /><br />Another anti-choice claim that is false is that the majority of (if not all) women regret their abortions. Now, anti-choicers not only <a href="http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/myths/post_abortion_syndrome.html">ignore the established fact that most women feel relief and not regret after an abortion</a>, but they’ve even gone ahead and tried to make their own reality by publishing non-reviewed articles on their websites and blogs.<br /><br />There are other anti-choice beliefs which obviously have no place in the real world- like the idea that all pro-choice women hate babies, or all pro-choice women abort.<br /><br />But recently, anti-choicers* have gone even farther. There is a website that I’ve recently learned about called <a href="http://www.ignoreroe.com/">Ignore Roe</a>. The concept is, as stated, that they believe everyone should just ignore Roe v Wade- as if it never happened. Via their homepage:<br /><br /> <blockquote>We begin with the premise that abortion is not legal, and can never BE legal, because abortion is the taking of innocent life, i.e. murder. Murder can never be legalized.</blockquote><br /><br />Just like that- taking reality and making it disappear. Or trying, at least. Thankfully, most anti-choicers (at least the ones I know) recognize that abortion is currently legal (even if they hate the fact). But the question is will this movement of ignoring established law spread?<br /><br />Antichoice clinic harassers constantly ignore law, like the FACE Act. Will they be the first ones to ignore Roe? Or have they already? The murderers among the clinic harassers, such as Roeder, seemed to have decided to ignore Roe and take the law into their own hands.<br /><br />How can anti-choicers be convinced to live in reality, and to accept reality? Factual evidence will not work unless the opposition is willing to accept real facts. Rational, logical discussion does not work unless both people or groups are willing to accept reality.<br /><br />* Obviously this does not apply to every single individual antichoicer.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-20814233026969883102010-12-11T18:24:00.001-05:002010-12-11T18:30:17.023-05:00Live-Tweeting an Abortion<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was written on September 30th, 2010 for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/09/live-tweeting-an-abortion/">AbortionGang.org</a>.</span><br /><br />It’s time to welcome abortion into the public world.<br /><br />What? Abortion is already in the public world, you say? Politicians have positions on it, activists blog about it and laws are made yearly to restrict it.<br /><br />Well, now abortion is getting even more personal. A couple of women have decided that writing about their experience on websites like <a href="http://www.thanksabortion.com/">thanksabortion.com</a> or <a href="http://www.imnotsorry.net/">imnotsorry.ne</a>t just isn’t cutting it. They have decided, instead, to tweet their abortion experience.<br /><br />Being able to tweet your abortion is fairly new. As more and more women opt to use mifepristone, the abortion pill, instead of a surgical abortion, there is more of an option to share what is happening. Of course, it isn’t just the abortion itself which these brave women are sharing, but also the process.<br /><br />A new twitter account called <a href="http://www.twitter.com/abortionreality">AbortionReality</a> has just shown up, to take us through the process of obtaining and having an abortion. Already she has tweeted about the difficulty of finding the funds to afford an abortion, as well as locating a clinic which provides abortions. Another user, <a href="http://twitter.com/antitheistangie">antitheistangie</a>, was the first to publicly tweet her abortion. Now AbortionReality follows her down this public path.<br /><br />No doubt, there will be many different reactions to people reading her tweets. Antichoicers are already trying to convince her not to have an abortion. Ironically, they are telling her “don’t just listen to one side.” At the same time, they refuse to accept her reasoning (which she shouldn’t even have to give). Prochoicers, from what I have seen, have mostly been giving her support. Which is great because regardless of our political views or job or marital status, women who have abortions are women who need support from the prochoice community. <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html">1 in 3 US women have an abortion sometime in their lifetimes</a>, but it’s not a label worn on the sleeve most of the time. Pro-choice activists can fill that gap by supporting women who are open about their abortions.<br /><br />But not every prochoicer feels the same way. Some pro-choice folks keep to the philosophy that abortion is a personal, private matter- and therefore it shouldn’t be shared on the internet publically. I absolutely believe that these people have a right to their opinions. I also think they can still support women who abort while wishing they kept it private.<br /><br />I personally think that tweeting an abortion can be a great way to show people outside the prochoice movement how difficult it is to obtain an abortion. Recent surveys show that <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/abortion/48_say_it_s_too_easy_to_get_an_abortion_in_america">many people believe it’s too easy obtain an abortion right now</a>. We need to show the reality and educate people. Between the Hyde Amendment, blocks on insurance paying for abortions, waiting periods, forced ultrasounds and sidewalk harassment, many women find it extremely difficult to obtain a legal abortion. That’s why some people are turning to DIY abortions- <a href="http://www.marieclaire.com/world-reports/news/latest/%20abortions-cow-medication">with cow medication</a> or trying to fall down stairs. These types of things need to be prevented by stopping and removing the outrageous and unnecessary restrictions on abortion.<br /><br />The first step to remove them is to open up the eyes of the public. AbortionReality is doing just that.Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6502394216918844890.post-62120947469811684862010-12-11T18:19:00.002-05:002010-12-11T18:24:08.721-05:00College-Bound Feminists<span style="font-style:italic;">This post was written September 7th 2010 for <a href="http://abortiongang.org/2010/09/college-bound-feminists/">AbortionGang.org</a> and is being listed here so that I may keep track of my own posts</span><br /><br /><br />YOU are what a young feminist looks like. And it’s that time of year again- when our young feminist friends head off to college. So here are a few tips for those heading to their dorm, whether it be for the first time or the fourth.<br /><br />After going to school with the same people through elementary, middle and high school, college can be both a breath of fresh air and a strange new environment. While everyone at home might know you’re a die-hard feminist, you might choose to not shove your feminism down the throat of could-be friends at college. So here are some ways to share your feminism without making your new friends choke on it.<br /><br />1. Get a Planned Parenthood magnet/business card and stick it on your fridge.<br /><br />This is helpful in so many ways. First, getting a magnet means that you have to know where your local Planned Parenthood is. This means you’ll have an easier time getting there if you need to go for another reason (no being late for appointments because you got lost!). Putting a magnet on your fridge allows any friend who comes over to your dorm/apartment to notice it any time they go to the fridge to get a drink. This will allow them to know that you support Planned Parenthood, but they don’t have to have a discussion with you unless they choose to bring it up. As an added bonus, if your friend who sees the magnet knows someone else who might need Planned Parenthood’s service, they might be able to suggest PP to that person where as they previously wouldn’t have thought about it.<br /><br />2. Like <a href="http://www.facebook.com/PlannedParenthood">Planned Parenthood</a> or <a href="http://www.facebook.com/%20naralprochoiceamerica">NARAL</a> or other prochoice women’s groups on facebook.<br /><br />What do people do after meeting someone new at college? Of course, they go home and look that person up on facebook. You can learn a lot about a person by looking at their facebook page these days. Let your new friends know that you support prochoice groups without bringing it up when you first meet. It’s a great way to start a conversation without actually putting yourself in an awkward place!<br /><br />3. Wear a prochoice or feminist button on your backpack.<br /><br />The ” I <3 prochoice boys” shirt is great, but it may be a bit forward for you on the first day of classes. A button on your backpack lets you show that you support equality for women without making it the only thing people remember about you. Even nicer, someone walking behind you who sees your button might strike up conversation and become your best friend, where previously you would have only passed in the hallway.<br /><br />There you go- three easy ways to share the fact that you’re a young feminist without alienating anyone. Do you, young feminist readers, have any other ideas?Christian Prochoicerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08173641901284085406noreply@blogger.com0